hi all.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Boud Roukema wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Andrzej Marecki wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:53:25PM +0100, Boud Roukema wrote:
The proposed text is between ######### - i'm not sure if Bartek or Andrzej want to sign, or even if this is compatible with Andrzej's arguments,
It's a clever "workaround". :) Go ahead!
It sure is. It sure is. :) It's like saying "go and find out yourself, the info is all around you, and to make it easier I drop you some links which are more less consistent with what I would have answered if you came to me for an interview (followed by a small bank money transfer ;p)." :)
I like this solution, since as I said before, more soriously this would sound if someone came to Boud personally (or phoned him) to ask for his oppinion on sciantific problems. This didn't happen, so to me it is just seeking for some answers, rather then collecting experts opinions on topology. The latter would naturally be followed by a quotations in a newspaper like ".....- says BR. from CAUMK", while the earlier results just in a pedagogical explanations in the related field. So the official answer is fine with me. Also I think there is no need for me to sign. I responded to cosmo-media and cosmo-torun to join the discussion, but the question was sent directly to Boud - he made it public - but natural way is that any reply goes from Boud. BTW. Neither I see no need to sign by Boud, according to what I've just wrote few lines above. That's my point of view.
pozdr, Bartek