hi cosmo-torun,
We've switched back to cosmo-media, since we have a proposal which seems to have consensus (so far): http://cosmo.torun.pl/pipermail/cosmo-media/2006-February/000055.html
pozdr boud
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Andrzej Marecki wrote:
Here's an attempt to summarise the ethics arguments/counterarguments for/against giving an answer:
4 (utilitarian argument) the "politically correct" side of axel springer (newsweek) is much more likely to be taken seriously and have an effect on CAUMK funding (e.g. grants) than RM would have (though this is not totally sure)
OK, but how can you make sure Axel Springer will NOT reprint your opinion in Fakt??? If you talk to them you then - AFAIK - _they_ own the copyright to distribute your opinions in the way *they* wish. Can you image the 1st page