Marcin Gawronski wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Boud Roukema wrote:
hi everyone, i definitely think we should respond to this - but i would prefer it to be a collective response - there's no reason why only my name should be cited - e.g., we could at least have the official "team"
hello all
I think Boud is the man in the position to say something about this stuff. From my point of view I'm not sure that the quality of data is sufficient to be convicted about validity of these results. It's all.
cheers
mpg
I am SURE the data is not convincing. but people get excited even if there is only 1 sigma difference between theory and observations. theoretists have very little to do since everything matches perfectly and even 1 sigma is an event... in case of cmb and low multipoles - with a slightly different analysis it does not give such exciting results ;-)
regards - michal forgive me but I am quite sceptic about this all.