witam cosmo-torun
(1) Research workshop!
title: Another way to select comoving 3-space speaker: boud when/where: Friday 15.00 godz. 20.11.2009 @KRA.
This topic will be different to my Monday KRA seminar. My Monday talk is about stuff on ArXiv.org and already peer-reviewed. Friday is for research-under-progress presentation/discussion - that's the idea, after all.
(2) We have to announce FNiS2010 (science festival) proposals by Monday 23 Nov!!!
Anyone interested in us doing something together, please speak up quickly, and we can briefly discuss it on Friday face-to-face (or tomorrow Thurs @KRA). Here's my proposal for what i'd like to talk about: http://cosmo.torun.pl/Cosmo/FestiwalNauki2010
pozdr boud
witam cosmo-torun
Research workshop!
title: curvature evolution: Stephani models = beyond FLRW speaker: boud when/where: Friday 15.00 godz. 27.11.2009 @KRA.
abstract: The FLRW models assume that comoving curvature is frozen. Inflationary motivations and models try to justify flatness and homogeneity, but nevertheless assume that comoving curvature is hardwired. Wouldn't it be more realistic to consider the possibilities of curvature evolution rather than hardwiring it? The Stephani models constitute a class of exact solutions in which the curvature of spatial sections can evolve. Could they help us get a better model of the real Universe? http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9908019 Sussman http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403534 Godlowski, Stermach, Szydlowski http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.2899 Dabrowski http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0008089 Chris A. Clarkson Glasgow PhD
BTW: Feel free to look at these articles, or at least their abstracts. i've only read a little, so other people may see other interesting things that i have missed, to make a more interesting discussion.
pozdr boud
witam cosmo-torun
Research workshop!
title: curvature evolution: Stephani models = beyond FLRW speaker: boud when/where: Friday 15.00 godz. 22.01.2010 @KRA.
abstract: The FLRW models assume that comoving curvature is frozen. Inflationary motivations and models try to justify flatness and homogeneity, but nevertheless assume that comoving curvature is hardwired. Wouldn't it be more realistic to consider the possibilities of curvature evolution rather than hardwiring it? The Stephani models constitute a class of exact solutions in which the curvature of spatial sections can evolve. Could they help us get a better model of the real Universe? http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9908019 Sussman http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403534 Godlowski, Stermach, Szydlowski http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.2899 Dabrowski http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0008089 Chris A. Clarkson Glasgow PhD
BTW: Feel free to look at these articles, or at least their abstracts. i've only read a little, so other people may see other interesting things that i have missed, to make a more interesting discussion.
pozdr boud