Cze�� wszystkim,
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Boud Roukema wrote: ...
Now, with a more "neutral" z distribution for the "randoms", the signal should in principle be stronger - if it is real.
Well, the resulting signal is spectacular! :) :) :) :)
We still have a lot of work to do (I have to get plot_cf working), but it seems clear that (0.3,0.7,-1.0) gives a bad fit, and that (0.3,0.7,w_Q) with
w_Q \approx -1.5
is likely to give a better fit and signal, which would greatly upset all the theorists!
Well, after the initial excitement, it looks like it's going to be less trivial than I thought to get an analysis which is totally clear and as little dependent on "arbitrary" decisions as possible...
Gary, as far as your talks are concerned, my feeling right at the moment (after having spent Friday night and the whole of Saturday working on this :( ) is that it would be better *not* to show the new plots to your seminar audiences, as they are "hot-off-the-press" results which have not yet been carefully enough thought through and checked, and they would distract from the careful, detailed analysis/discussion in RMB02.
You can certainly say that we're continuing to work on this and that we got some exciting stuff last week. Anyone who seriously would like to contribute to the project is welcome to subscribe to the mailing list (info below) and to help develop the software package DE.
People in Toru�: the people at Piwnice yesterday decided to have another meeting next Friday (14:00 as usual), even though officially the academic year is over. So it's an unofficial wyk�ad :). But I'm no longer sure that we can have a paper ready by the end of June - at least my guess right now is that it's less easy than I thought...
Na ra�e Boud